July 1916 remains an unforgettable moment in maritime history, when the coastline of New Jersey became the site of underwater horror. Over a span of twelve days, a series of shark attacks—two in open ocean waters and three in the brackish Matawan Creek—sent shockwaves across the nation. The mysterious predator, nicknamed the Matawan Man-Eater, spurred fear and fascination that still spark debates that endure to this day. While some theories attribute the shark attacks to a single predator, others theorize that multiple sharks may have been involved. As we revisit this incident, we explore the most compelling theories to uncover what might have drawn marine predators into such an unusual setting.
Environmental Changes: A Disruptive Summer
The summer of 1916 brought record-breaking heat to the American East Coast, with high temperatures transforming the aquatic environment. Such environmental transformations are known to destabilize ecosystems, thus triggering changes between predator and prey dynamics. Unusually warm waters near the coastline may have reduced the abundance of prey, leaving larger predators like sharks to travel farther in search of food. Matawan Creek, with its brackish waters and slower currents, could have appeared as a promising hunting ground.
Moreover, experts today understand that temperature fluctuations can disorient marine species, causing them to venture into unfamiliar territories. While scientific data specific to the summer of 1916 is sparse, the idea of sharks responding to environmental stress remains plausible and has been observed in other shark-human encounters.
Bull Sharks: The Freshwater Specialists
Bull sharks are often considered possible suspects in the Matawan attacks because of their unique ability to thrive in both saltwater and freshwater. This is possible thanks to a special process in a bull shark’s physiology called osmoregulation, which helps them maintain the right balance of salt and water in their bodies. A key part of this involves their rectal gland which removes excess salt when they’re in the ocean, and their kidneys which help conserve salt and water when they move into freshwater. Their gills also play a role by helping them adjust to the changing environment. Bull sharks have even been known to swim far up rivers around the world, making it easy to see why they’re strong contenders for the Matawan attacks.
Adding to their notoriety is their bold hunting behavior and adaptability. Bull sharks have been observed preying on anything from fish to birds to dolphins to even cannibalizing each other, and have been recorded attacking humans in the ocean. Their aggression in unfamiliar environments aligns with the incidents of 1916. While physical evidence (such as teeth fragments) was never definitively linked to a bull shark, their biological traits and behavioral patterns make them a leading culprit.
Rogue Great White Shark: Fact or Fiction?
The great white shark occupies a special place in this mystery, thanks to cultural narratives that have shaped its image as a terrifying apex predator. Following the attacks, a great white was captured off the coast of New Jersey and remains of humans were reportedly found from its stomach. This discovery led to widespread belief that this single shark was responsible for the Matawan attacks.
However, modern science challenges the “rogue predator” theory. Great whites typically prefer open ocean habitats and are rarely found in estuarine environments like Matawan Creek. Their presence so far inland is considered highly unusual, casting doubt on whether the great white alone was behind the tragedy. Still, the 1916 events contributed significantly to the mythology surrounding this species, eventually inspiring Peter Benchley’s Jaws in 1974—a novel turned into a cinematic phenomenon that forever changed how society views sharks.
Could There Be Multiple Sharks?
While much of the focus has been on a single predator, some researchers suggest that the attacks might not have been the work of one shark at all. Instead, the geographical spread and timing of the incidents raise the possibility of multiple predators. This theory assumes that environmental stress—whether due to temperature, prey scarcity or other factors—brought several sharks into closer contact with human activity, resulting in the tragic encounters.
By acknowledging the potential for multiple culprits, this perspective broadens the ecological narrative, pointing to how varied factors in marine ecosystems can converge to create such rare events.
Wartime Speculative Theories
The cultural context of 1916 gives rise to some of the more speculative explanations for the attacks. During World War I, fears of German U-boats patrolling the Atlantic were rampant. Some researchers believe that these submarines could have disturbed marine habitats, driving sharks closer to shore. While there is no scientific evidence to support this idea, it reflects the global tensions of the era and humanity’s tendency to attribute mysterious phenomena to broader crises.
Other theories, ranging from migratory anomalies to behavioral quirks, have occasionally surfaced, but they remain outside the realm of scientific validation.
The Enduring Legacy of the Matawan Shark Attacks
The Matawan Man-Eater incident was transformative as it left a significant mark on humanity’s relationship with sharks. Before these attacks, sharks were considered little more than curious marine animals that cleaned up the seas. However, the events of 1916 reframed them as dangerous predators that brought widespread fear. This perception was later amplified by cultural milestones like Jaws and, more recently, Shark Week—an annual celebration of shark awareness that captivates audiences worldwide. In fact, Shark Week pays special homage to the Matawan events, reflecting on their lasting impact on shark research and conservation efforts.
In truth, the Matawan Man-Eater incident stands out as a rare and highly unusual event in the history of human-shark interactions. Sharks are often misunderstood and unfairly labeled as mindless predators, yet the reality is quite different. The vast majority of shark species avoid humans and attacks are exceedingly rare. Most of the known attack encounters occur because sharks mistake humans for their natural prey (such as sea lions) or are simply curious—an unfortunate consequence of their environment and instincts, rather than deliberate aggression.
The events of Matawan Creek in 1916 were an anomaly, likely driven by unique environmental factors or an extraordinary set of circumstances. While these attacks have left a lasting impression on public consciousness, they should not overshadow the critical role sharks play in marine ecosystems. As apex predators, they maintain the balance of ocean life, ensuring the health of the ecosystems that millions depend on for food and livelihood.
The legacy of the Matawan Man-Eater reminds us to approach the natural world with both cautious respect and deep understanding. Sharks are neither villains nor monsters but vital creatures in a delicate ecological web. Their stories—whether inspired by fear or fascination—teach us to be wary yet compassionate stewards of our planet’s incredible biodiversity. By learning from the past and acting with care, we can coexist with even the ocean’s most enigmatic inhabitants while protecting the natural balance that sustains us all.
Header Image: Teeth of a bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas). Source: Public Domain.
_front_cover,_first_edition.jpg){kind=link}
